The University of Oklahoma is conducting research in an
effort to improve the general education requirements for students.
The research is being conducted by Clarissa Thompson, an OU
psychology professor, and Michele Eodice, director of the OU writing center.
The research efforts hope to improve the quality of students’ general education
and experience.
Their research is aimed at asking students to share their
perceptions of the benefits they receive from general education at OU, Eodice
said.
In order for OU to maximize its general education for
students, professors and students need to meet in the middle, Thompson said.
“I think we both have to meet together and it’s not just
that we are here to fill these empty vessels of students, but they have to want
to learn,” Thompson said.
The results and analysis may take awhile, but their goal is
to provide the best learning experience for students, Thompson said.
One thing students can do is find out what methods of
learning and studying works best for them in certain subjects, Eodice said.
Michael Wenger, a psychology professor and researcher at OU,
believes an internal discussion about how students and teachers could come
together in an effort to maximize the benefits of general education is
something that could help OU.
For now, student evaluations are a prominent method of
changing courses, but Thompson and Wenger both said the evaluations are usually
only completed by students who love or hate the professors.
The students in between, who would help the most, are the
ones often not completing the evaluations, Thompson said.
Also, the response rate on the evaluations have declined ever since they switched to the online evaluations, Thompson said.
Also, the response rate on the evaluations have declined ever since they switched to the online evaluations, Thompson said.
Anything that can be done in order to make students realize
the importance of the course and teacher evaluations is something that needs to
be discussed, Wenger said.
Along with an internal discussion, publishing the results of
student evaluations and showing students they can create positive change to the
courses are some ways Wenger feels could help general education be a more
effective educational tool at OU.
Travis McKinney, an OU energy management major, is currently
enrolled in meteorology in order to fill his natural science requirement. Without
this class to meet the requirement, McKinney would be unable to graduate in the
spring of 2013.
Although he feels that some aspects of general education are
pointless, he said that he is glad to see some things being done to improve it.
“There are classes that are too hard and too easy, but
there’s also classes in [general education] that really help. I think there is
a way for [students, professors and faculty] to find a solution so that each
student can take the classes they need to or should take, instead of take what
they [are required] to,” McKinney said.
OU requires that students take 40 hours of the general
education curriculum in five core areas; symbolic and oral communication,
natural science, social science, humanities and senior capstone experience.
To meet those 40 hours, OU offers over 400 classes to meet
the five core areas of general education requirements.
The American Council of Trustees and Alumni, a nonprofit
organization, is also performing a study on general education aimed to help
students and parents find out what colleges and universities have to offer for
their money.
An ACTA operated website, “What Will They Learn?,” grades
schools based on their education requirements. OU received a “B” from the
website.
Thompson and Eodice plan to continue their research project
for the foreseeable future. The results will hopefully find their way to the general
education board and fix any problems they can, Eodice said.